As the San Francisco 49ers’ spot grew closer, the fans on Twitter started freaking out because Coby Fleener and Stephen Hill, the predicted picks du jour for Trent Baalke and Jim Harbaugh, were still available. Also on the board: Reuben Randle and Alshon Jeffery.
Yet, as I predicted, the 49ers drafted Jenkins. Ha! Like anyone can predict a HarBaalke draft pick, especially someone like me who has no inside sources on the Niners. Janoris Jenkins was an attempt to be clever by yours truly (and Warfe truly), but Trent Baalke in effect said, “JANORIS ISN’T THE JENKINS VALUE PICK YOU’RE LOOKING FOR.”
Speaking of Mr. Warfe, let’s look at A.J. Jenkins, the receiver from the University of Illinois who has to be on cloud (forty) nine right now, and how he fits in with Baalke’s drafting tendencies.
It looks like Baalke as a thing for petite, quick receivers — emphasis on the quickness, which is a trait he praised Kyle Williams for having. Crabtree is the outlier in this list, but given the events surrounding the pick, it is not surprising that he doesn’t fit the mold.
Attribute Range Average Height 5-9 – 6-1 5-11 Weight 185 – 215 198 40 Y/D 4.32 – 4.52 4.44 Vertical 33 – 40.5 37 Shuttle 4.01 – 4.29 4.18 Broad Jump 09’07” – 10’04” 10’00 3-Cone Drill 6.64 – 7.06 6.90 These numbers are pretty similar, especially in regards to size and speed. It is also important to note college production. All of the receivers, save Rasheed Marshall, had plenty of game experience at the position and were relatively successful. In fact, since the days of Bill Walsh, every receiver selected by the 49ers in the first round has been a prolific pass catcher in college.
A.J. Jenkins
Height: 6’0¼”
Weight: 190
40-time: 4.39
Vertical: 38.5″
Broad jump: 10’4″
Shuttle, 3-Cone Drill: N/A
Looking at his measurables and where the 49ers drafted him, it appears Williams’ job is in jeopardy. Considering how last season ended for Williams, with other teams targeting his head and multiple fumbles in the most important game of the year, that can’t exactly be a surprise.
Jenkins was also a “prolific pass catcher in college,” with 90 receptions for 1,276 yards and 8 TD in 2011, his senior year. It’s also worth mentioning that while Jenkins had several outstanding games in ’11 — including a 2-game stretch against Northwestern and Indiana where he amassed 450 yards and 5 touchdowns — he also displayed great timing … and I’m not talking about his route-running abilities.
Jenkins caught 8 passes for 103 yards against Michigan, Jim Harbaugh’s alma mater. In the last game of Jenkins’ collegiate career, he caught 6 passes for 80 yards and a score and ran once for 16 yards against UCLA in the Fight Hunger Bowl at AT&T Park. That game, a 20-14 win for the Fighting Illini, was extremely ugly on television. But it sure made for some easy scouting for the 49ers.
Marvin Jones has been a popular choice for 49ers fans looking for a supposed under-the-radar receiver in the 2012 NFL Draft. Part of why people like Jones is that, while he was overshadowed a bit by Keenan Allen, both Cal receivers were hindered by less-than-stellar quarterback play.
Jenkins was in the same boat at Illinois, a team that in 2011 won its first six games, lost its next six, then beat a pretty lousy UCLA team in that aforementioned bowl game. Their No. 1 QB, Nathan Scheelhaaase, is more of a mediocre runner (he “led” the team with 624 yards on 191 carries, a measly 3.3 avg.) than a mediocre passer (184-for-291, 2,110 yards, 13 TD and 8 INT). But take a look at Jenkins’ production compared to his teammates on the receiving end (courtesy of ESPN):
You almost feel sorry for Jenkins, who accounted for over half his team’s receiving yards and touchdowns. He had a running quarterback and no other receivers to help him, and he still put together one of the best statistical campaigns of anyone in the draft against strong competition.
Some are wondering if the 49ers could’ve traded down, added a pick or two and still came out of this draft with Jenkins. However, just because he wasn’t talked about in this region like Fleener or Hill doesn’t mean Jenkins would’ve remained available for long. Walter Football had him going to the Jaguars at No. 38 overall. So did Mel Kiper, who called Jenkins “a riser on my board.”
Update: I got the heads-up from @yongdol that, according to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, the Rams were seriously considering Jenkins with the No. 33 pick overall. The story also included this:
League sources told the Post-Dispatch on Thursday afternoon that the Rams liked Jenkins so much that his grade wasn’t much different than the one given Blackmon by the team’s personnel department. Blackmon was the first wide receiver taken in the draft, going No. 5 to Jacksonville (which traded up with Tampa Bay for the pick.)
Now the Niners shift from a receiving corps of Crabtree, Williams, Brett Swain and your mom (sorry, it’s late) to Crabtree, Randy Moss, Mario Manningham and Jenkins. With hindsight providing a little illumination, the Jenkins selection (A.J., not Janoris) makes a lot of sense. He has the physical tools and college numbers Baalke looks for, but due to the team Jenkins played for he wasn’t heralded to the point where Baalke needed to trade up to get him. However, if Jenkins didn’t run a 4.39 at the NFL Combine, Baalke may have been able to trade down — but it appears he got the man he was looking for, and that’s what matters most.
Now it’s up to Alex Smith to show Jenkins what it’s like to play with a real quarterback.















49ers Hot Read
49ersnews.com
49erswebzone.com
Niner Insider
Athletics Nation
95.7 FM The Game
Bay Area Sports Talk
Popblerd
Ray Ratto – CSNBA
Ruthless Sports
Giants Extra
Giants Talk
Giants365.com
GiantsPod
Optioned to Fresno
Fangraphs
Pro Football Talk
Feltbot's Warriors Blog
Joe Lacob & Co. [libelous slander]
WarriorsCentral.com

I can't find the the post where he said I should never say shuddup to somebody. Is shuddup too harsh a word after I'm called a clown? I think not...lol...
I think,that I have made some fantastically accurate observations just based on what I see through the media. And do you know why for example it wasn't until the start of Russell's third year I waited to say about Russell and his mental state?..because in his first two years HE DIDN'T GIVE INTERVIEWS..not the sit down and talk to one of those blonds on Comcast or Papa.When he did, THAT'S when it hit me..he doesn't smile, he didn't make jokes,he seemed to take it hard when asked if he felt it was his fault the team lost..and with what else I read of him..I saw a different man then the local media's lazy fat bum. He's no saint gone bad that's for sure..but after that I posted about his need for a life coach. And on that..no surprise that it failed in the long run..and no surprise his life coach still wouldn't bash him in public for failing. Faulty people can still be friendly. So, In conclusion-lol..IF I can get some facts,I can damn well see things better then most..and it ain't just sports. But if you want to judge on who did I predict to win this weekend,or how did the trade turn out perfection..eh,not my specialty...just very good,wink,wink. One last-what I know about the locals? JUST observations..not a stalker,or a hacker..If I say what they said and it sounds personal...its because THEY said it themselves on 50,000 watts or National TV, or in their column,etc..
Stan, I'll wrap my part of this debate up with a couple points: 1. I will never agree that you are the amazing contributor that you feel you are. You use way too much opinion in your postings and are too often off the mark. 2. You have made good points and called a few things correctly. 3. Often, you can ruin a good point by following a tangent into a bad one. When you do this you ruin your good point. 4. I definitely respect your ability to stay in a debate. However, when you tell someone to "shuddup" it weakens your side. Feel free to get the last word in if you wish, I'm closing up shop on this one.
You ever stop to think, stan, that you came with the crowd rather than the crowd with you? I'm pretty sure this blog started taking off because it gained relevance in Google's Analytics. That's how I found it at the very least.
Everythings a coincidence? I guess when I said Lincecums pitching problems were weigh related in 2010...just pure luck...Or Russells addictive personality and depression? Another wild guess that was right. Huff was out of shape I said last April of 2011 because of his BPH ave...(beers per hour)..and sure enough,Huff himself this year said he gave up the beer,Baggs THIS year, also said Huff after 2010 had partied and drank too much. But Baggs wasn't first-I was. And the ESPN thing right here on BASG blog..first in the country on something that made headlines. PURE LUCK?..hee. Lucky for bay area celebritys its just a hobby..if I was paid,it would be scorched earth reporting!..by Stan...lol...
And how's Steve's blog done since I got here but get bigger and badder? huh? lol...I got it and know it.
One ,more to make you think...When I first started posting..Kawakami's blog was a preference...after a year there he said "I just had my best year in views ever"...then he banned me..and I doubt he's said that again. Rich Leiberman...after posting there for a year,Rich posted a topic of "My best year"..so,no I dont drag a blog down..Au contraire bon ami's, the opposite. I'm think Lowell and Grant have some appreciation of my participation too. And I say,thanks Cohn family. I hear Lowell's wife is hot...
One,ONE more.... SF Gate? when I started posting there THAT part of their sports section had cobwebs...so unread,posts asked questions or remarks of "18 months ago"..get the picture?
I do admit I wasnt first to catch on to Radnich..Leiberman beat me there first..and Berman seems like he's learnign fast. I still cant get watching him play act live on TV a full blown lie about me. If It bothered him so much..just toss my note in the trash...but he trashed me with scary accusations. So to see him be "sincere" about anything is a red flag.
You know Inqb.don't tell Picasso he doesn't know how to paint or Einstein he doesn't know Cosmology... ...Or Walsh doesn't know football because you found a wrong someplace in what they said....
Stan, Stan, Stan, (shaking my head) there you go again mixing your dillusions with reality. Picasso, Einstein, Walsh: all professionals. Unless you make your living analyzing sports in some way, you're nothing like those great people. You're nothing like their lesser known colleagues, who themselves are professionals. You, in fact, are some guy who spouts off every opinion that comes to mind without thinking once about facts to back it up. Every now and then you get lucky with a statement you make, but most of the things that you go on about turn out to be misses (how's that Melky for Sanchez trade that you hated working out for the Royals?). You see the blog we're reading here has become a success because Steve (congrats by the way, BASG) has been trained well in backing opinion with facts. I seem to recall you reading something you said about having had a blog with sfgate. What happened to that blog? My guess is that people got tired of hearing hastily shared opinions without getting a reason for them. So, Walsh you are not. Picasso? Definitely no. Einstein? Well there,s about as much of a quantum probability of me walking through a wall than you being in the same realm as him in terms of "sporting genius". Take a seat stan
SF Gate buckled under to the Giants..my posts on Lincicum were making the Giants angry,and the conservatives who run that sports section werent happy either. NO wonder Bronstein left SF Gate taking potshots at it while leaving. Its as close being a Murdoch paper with only liberal pretenses.
stan, you don't have a record. There's no official stan scorecard out there with hits and misses marked. What there are out there are legions of people giving you thumbs down on a lot of what you have to say (and they certainly aren't all trolls like you say they are). This isn't because they are jealous of you or can't handle the "truth", it's because what you say most of the time is just well off the mark. How'd Carson Palmer work out for the Raiders last year? Because you predicted playoffs and possibly a Super Bowl? Remember when you predicted the Niners would return back to Earth last season? I guess your analysis lacked an accounting of the defense and its ability to stop an opponent from scoring. As you say, there are flaws in your breakdowns. What you don't admit is that there are a lot. You're average stan, just average.
Later,I just saw this-lol...I'm typed out...but later check back...
Of course you couldn't foresee McFaddan's injury and the effect it would have on the offense. However, it wasn't McFaddan's sore foot making Palmer throw those INT's. Granted, having DMF would've taken a little pressure off of Palmer, but 16 INT's to 13 TD's? Explain to me again what it was that you said about Lincecum and Huff that nobody else seemed to know.
Carson Palmer? Like all your rebuttal-you leave out plenty. AFTER the Palmer trade?,Darren McFadden didn't play another game!..if the Raiders had known they would lose him and Campbell..they wouldn't have made the trade. And you do remember that Al had just died..and it was win for his memory. Trolls? I rarely use the term..but looking at the FB of so many here..all that "Ted Nugent,FOX news, give me my big black SUV gas hog,conservatives,Obama is Obammy. types.." They don't care If I'm right,they just love right wing. Hell,INQB...you still wont say about Huff and Lincecum,et al..and well,if somebody else could do all that they would . But they didnt .I did.
Walsh passed on drafting Brady,Einstein thought Relativity could explain all. He hadn't considered quantum mechanics and of course could never have known about the real existence of dark energy or dark matter. On the other hand he had inklings...just like me,using mental analytic's based on observations and knowledge gained over a lifetime..I cut through the BS younger people don't get. about big business and tendency's and ..well,weird media and sports personality's that are almost text book. I'm not sure if its the worry the truth will keep them away from the players is why sports writers try to keep it simple. I have no worry. I also have a damn good record.
I'll pull a stan here and reply to my own comment to apologize for the grammatical errors in the last post. It seems that typing a post out on an iPad takes a bit more oversight than typing it on a laptop or a PC. Stan, I said sit down.
Oh,how could I forget?? right here on BASG i was the first to catch ESPN and there "chink" slur...a week before the rest of the country heard ESPN do it a second time! And then Ipost here on BASG blog,that I couldnt see how Gore's hip could take that beating early last season. I said he must be Superman..in print,right here. That same week Harbaugh laughed and called Gore "Superman".around a Friday presscon...that Sunday (5th game of the season~?)..Gore was hurt...never played a full game the rest of the year. Ask BASG/Steve if you doubt.
Stan, after getting a free moment I actually was able to find your post after a minute of searching: "Joe Looney,guard. A headline writers dream." Pretty good call--even though you really only mention that his name is a good one for newspaper writers to use--not that he would be drafted by the Niners. I do give you props however on knowing that he was out there to be drafted and in connecting that the Niners needed a guard. Finally (and this is most important), you make a good amount of bad calls, stan. These you never acknowledge, so I will if you'd like.
You want perfection? read the bible. As I said,nothing supernatural about me. Oh,and by the way,when Grant asked who next? I said maybe somebody local?...and Ousiu or however you spell his name was picked the next day or so... One last Inq B..just as you say I don't mention some things...YOU aren't admitting I was right-and truthful about what I said FAR ahead of media. From Huff,Russell and Lincecum, to ESPN right here on BASG. Nobody else has done that. Nobody.
I was reminded of another "I'm read by people you wouldnt think.."..A few years ago I posted that long evaluation of Russell..and I said that I thought the Raiders should hire a life coach for JaMarcus. And later..guess what the Raiders did? Coincidence?..yeah, a big one.
Ask Grant Cohn..email. Otherwise you can go through the 1,000x's posts he's gotten on the draft to find them and link. But I'm certain that the Looney was last week,and the WR as first rounder the same day of that round. Anyway's Grant knows. Same for Huff and Lincecum,Russell and his addictions and I dont know how many others ( they come to me when a topic comes up) I've called,predicted and explained long ahead of the curve. Ask Lowell since my posts got deleted when they changed formats. But I know he backs up my claims. Interesting that not only did I sort of hit on Huffs beer love long before anybody else..I said after the Mets game,that I thought (in laymens terms I admit) that Huff was cracking under the pressure..while the Giants at that time were insisting it was a family issue. See? if you read me first..you get to the truth first.
And yet still no physical proof of the "genius" of Stan in the Niners going after Looney. I will not sort through hundreds of posts in order to find yours. I leave the burden of proof to you. Until then, you're just a guy saying he saw things coming...after they happen.
Let me break it down even simpler..my proof is email Grant. You wont?..so shuddup.
See, this is what gets me about a guy or gal like you. My very first sentence I said,it was part of thousands of posts to Grants draft blog. And I said you or anybody else can go through them..or ask Grant via email. Simple. Just as Granted posted here a couple of weeks ago..he knows I'm a regular..and Lowell? as moderator of his own blog he HAD to read EVERY one of my posts..And I'm pretty sure he remembers the I told you so's too! Hey,I know your searching for a way to save face,and get around emailing. I mean,you wont even email real journalists?....
Then shut up. I'm not your minion. Email too hard for you? or you don't want to know?. My advice is..if your going to play that game,do it so you don't look like a fool.. All those things(and contacts) I list and its not enough..then you fixate on linking to Looney? tells me you remember the ESPN,the Gore if your a regular BASG reader. I told you how to get what you want..you don't do it..that's on you.
Nothing supernatural mind you. Just brilliant observational skills,life experience. Sort of like what Adrian Monk does. Ever see that show?
Stan, all I can say is that if you have proof of your call (like a link to it, perhaps) then I obviously will respect the call. If not, then I will not believe a single word of it. BASG, is there a post limit on how many characters a person can post? I tried to post a well worded response to Stan's rebuttal above but the site wouldn't post it. Thanks.
I'll take a "yer mom" joke where I can get it.
I gotta dust off the old "yo mama for dummys" joke book Jewl. Let's see, "When yo mama sits around the house,she sits arooooound the.."..lol. Man that's classic!..right there with orange and blue Nikes..remember those Jewelia? Who says I post like I'm talkin to myself? I resemble that remark!..classics, I got em!
And Yeah,if I had half a grapefruit in my hand and your a woman Inq-b,I would rub it your face!!
That's a James Cagney reference to you younger type. Seek WIKI for more..
I'm sure BASG,Scott,Raider guy...they see what I put up with. Guy or gals like you INQ B...come up with the clever (maybe) putdown..and you leave out one fact among your insults..That I HAD THE CALL RIGHT..49ers,Huff,Tim..so it just down to..you wish you could do that. Even your second post about Harbaugh fooling..well, how idiotic is it to put me down when I'm on record of saying he would never pick Fleener and then said he would pick a WR?..what a nit wit hater you must be.
You fool, you didn't even have have AJ Jenkins in your top five! Just kidding BASG, I love the new look to the website and as Krueger stated last night, Jenkins' name never even came up in their discussions of where the Niners might go. Harbaugh last night probably went to bed smiling and loving the fact that the media never saw this one coming. He must wake up everyday and ask himself, "How will I mess with the media's agenda today?"
I just about called it perfect. Yesterday pre draft I said the 49ers would go for a WR. Only I figured by the time the teams turn came they would get what was rated the 5th best WR (Alabama)..and it turned out the 49ers got the 3rd or 4th best WR in the draft. Yeah,I'm on to Harbaugh..the more you media pushed for Fleener..the less the H-man would want him. Its why he ignored TO last year and then signed another -Moss- who's hated by ALL local media.
Stan, you're seriously a clown. When you "just about called it perfect" you made a guess on a position that many people were guessing. In addition, whose metrics are you using in valuing Jenkins at third or fourth best?
I called Joe Looney to the 49ers too. So,once again I am right. And you say what..? lol..
Why not say what people like you REALLY mean when you try to take me on? "I wish I could do what Stan does"..that's it huh?
Your the clown -as usual Ink. Finds "the many people posts" of picking WR..I didn't see you say that. I didn't see BASG and co..I didn't see Grant Cohn. And Ink,I read and watch,Mel Kuiper had the top 5 WR...and I agreed. So,now your going to comeback after A: I'm on record as being right. B: I give you references. I 'm sorry to have to put you in your place..but you did ASSk for it!
Reserving judgment...