With the struggles of David Akers this season, I had hoped Jim Harbaugh would elect to go for more first downs, rather than settle for field goals.
To see if this has happened, I decided to go back and look at what the 49ers’ 4th downs this season. I then evaluated whether these were good choices using the 4th down calculator tool from Advanced NFL Stats.
The calculator measures whether the punt/field goal was worth more in either expected points in the first half (I figured it was more important to just try to score points) or in added win probability in the second half.
|
Game
|
Good Punts
|
Bad Punts
|
Good FG
|
Bad FG
|
Good Go For 1st
|
Bad Go For 1st
|
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
|
2
|
0
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
|
5
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
6
|
4
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
|
7
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
8
|
4
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
9
|
4
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
|
10
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
11
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
12
|
4
|
2
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
13
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
14
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
15
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
16
|
4
|
1
|
4
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
|
Total
|
43
|
24
|
24
|
18
|
11
|
1
|
I was pretty surprised by the number of “bad punt” calls from Harbaugh. In all, 36% of punt decisions were considered bad strategy. I remembered a few of these calls that made me scratch my head, but after going back and looking at things, I was surprised at the number of punts that were called when there was less than five yards to go and the 49ers had the ball within their own 40 yard line in.
There were several times in the game against the Lions where Harbaugh elected to punt from the Lions’ side of midfield. In doing so, Harbaugh eschewed the high potential of a 4th-and-short conversion and chose a net gain of around 30 yards of field position. The other thing I noticed is the 49ers allow long sacks on 3rd downs, which essentially pushes them back into 4th-and-impossible situations.
Field goals present a similar story. I did not look at the actual result of the field goal, just how it affected the expected points or expected winning percentage. The analysis assumes an average kicker, which Akers has not been. And so, we can further assume that electing for field goals in certain situations was not the optimal choice.
Nearly half of the 49ers’ field goal tries were non-optimal. The biggest driver of this was kicking a medium to long field goal with just one or two yards to go for a first down and kicking short field goals inside the opponents 10-yard line. Given how badly Akers performed this season, some of these choices look even worse.
When Harbaugh did elect to go for it on 4th down, it was often in the correct times. The one time Harbaugh wrongly attempted to convert on fourth down was the fake punt against the Patriots. This scenario could be the exception, as it was a trick play designed to catch the opponent by surprise.
Overall, Harbaugh did well when he decided to go for it, but looking at the other numbers, I just wish that he bucked conventional wisdom and actually went with the true high percentage play that would give the team a better chance of winning games. In the playoffs against teams that will match up with 49ers talent wise, little things like optimal strategy could be the key to winning games. With the 49ers looking for new kickers to try to solve that problem, I hope that Harbaugh will lean less on his special teams and play for the first down when the numbers and situation are in his favor.














49ers Hot Read
49ersnews.com
49erswebzone.com
Niner Insider
Athletics Nation
95.7 FM The Game
Bay Area Sports Talk
Popblerd
Ray Ratto – CSNBA
Ruthless Sports
Giants Extra
Giants Talk
Giants365.com
GiantsPod
Optioned to Fresno
Fangraphs
Pro Football Talk
Feltbot's Warriors Blog
Joe Lacob & Co. [libelous slander]
WarriorsCentral.com

13-3 to 11-4-1 Niners wouldn't be here BUT FOR HARBAUGH go niners
I absolutely think that the 49ers should go for it more than they do. With a strong running game, a high completion % and a strong defense, they seem to be more likely to make the 4th down and less likely to get burned by it than a normal NFL team. That being said, when looking at all those "bad punts" you have to realize that most every coach in the league is making similarly bad punting decisions. The expected value math just hasn't moved the needle on coaching strategy, and compared with his peers, Harbaugh is not as conservative as we think in this regard.
Hey - do you have a google docs spreadsheet that you can share -- so I don't need to re-create your work? I'd like to see how big the differences were between modeled EPA and actual EPA (and modeled WPA and actual WPA). I say that because if Harbuagh is making the wrong decisions by small margins, I don't really care. If these are huge errors, I care a lot.
Unfortunately I do not. If I remember right for the most part things weren't huge swings, but quite a few were in the magnitude of 2-3 expected points or higher.
That seems like a lot, sounds substantial. A typical 4th and 2 from your opponents' 30 results in an EP of 2.4 if successful, -1.25 if unsuccessful. going for it is 3.47/-.9, and punting is a .21.
I looked at EPA/play on 4th downs through the New England game -- and we look pretty darn good. Average EPA/play is 0.39. Of Andy Lee's 59 punts, 8 had a negative EPA. List of 'bad punts': - TD Return by Randall Cobb (Obvious) - (2) 2nd quarter punts against Detroit (from DET 39 and 41) - a first quarter punt vs. SEA from the SEA 41 (first game) - (2) 2nd quarter punts in first Rams game (from STL 37 and 49) -- they both netted 33 and 29 yards (touchback) - 2nd quarter punt in second rams game (touchback) - opening drive punt vs. MIA
I didn't keep the raw data, just the running tally as I was going through things. Maybe if I run into a slow day at work I will pull everything again and take a look at that.
still statistically significant. if you still have the data locally, I'd recommend just averaging the Net EPA for all fourth down situations.
I am misremembering, it should be some where 1-2 points not 2-3 points.
That comment above read like a guy still nursing a hangover...what i mean is, I'm not sure if you will see them going for it, or trying long field goals with those two. I also wonder if you will see more big play attempts to get the team down the field, and into the red zone more often than working short stuff where you night end up in long field goal range a lot.
I'm not sure signing a kicker with a history of big misses is going to help this image at all. Now, you have a conservative offense, built around a young quarterback, not one, but 2 kickers that have the yips, and a defense that burps up huge clusters of points. Curious to see who they run up against in the playoffs, and the how this whole thing works out. Not entirely confidence inspiring, BUT so far Harbaugh has been successful in his decisions. Its ironic that his decisions (QB change, kicker, etc,) are anything but conservative, while his play calling is.
He doesn't exactly have many options at kicker, I don't think this is remotely anywhere near what he wants.
I would like to see less conservative play calling on both sides of the ball when the 49ers have a lead. Harbaugh seems to want to run out the clock way too early in the game. In other words, keep scoring points and keep playing aggressive defense.
Since the Singletary and Nolan times, and the offensive coordinators Hostler and Jimmy Raye times, we have been dadgum conservative! Even now with Harbaugh I see some conservative approaches. What is it with conservative play calling? What's the deal? Are we ready to go past that and set ourselves on a higher bar?
I agree up to a point. Does that calculator factor in the kind of defense the Niners have? I think part of the reason Harbaugh is willing to punt from the opponents 40 without thinking twice is that he knows Lee can pin them inside their five consistently and the D can make the opposing offense feel very uncomfortable in a shrunken field. Harbaugh has already shown that he changes his strategies over time, that or he just doesn't show his hand. Many thought Alex would play out his three years because Harbaugh loves him so much, but when it came down to it, Harbaugh showed what his real plan was. I think he'll evolve and change over time based on what he thinks will work, and how much faith he has in each respective side of the ball. I really do enjoy these kind of problems over the ones we've had for most of the last ten years from the head coach.
Because the defense is so good is precisely why you SHOULD GO FOR the first down. They can hold them any place on the field..or could, before Justin Smith was hurt. When you lose the NFC champ.game with your last four series being 3 and outs?...your OC is wide open and ripe for criticism.
As much as we critique Harbaugh, how much impact is his success having on the 7 teams hunting for a new HC?
I agree. We are so starved for creative play calling the fake punt and Ck's end run stand out like Taser shots. Yet,they were just two plays in dullsville. I want to be tased bro!