As promised, I’m revisiting the statistical comparison of Alex Smith and Colin Kaepernick I did nearly a month ago. In the previous, Kaepernick had just completed his fourth start, a game in which he and the 49ers dominated the Miami Dolphins, which was cause for me to conclude that Kaepernick and Smith were essentially the same quarterback and that neither was better than the other, nor worse for that matter.
As it turns out, this comparison will be more equitable than the previous, as both Smith and Kaepernick ended the season with 218 pass attempts. This means whatever conclusions drawn will likely be more representative of the truth. I didn’t alter Smith stats as a result of his short completion to Bruce Miller in Week 17. I didn’t see the point, to be honest. Really, that short completion and subsequent victory formation “runs” only injured Smith’s stats. So, what follows is Alex Smith’s stats from Week 1 through Week 13, and Colin Kaepernick’s from Week 11 through Week 17.

Explanatory Note: Most of these stats are taken from TeamRankings.com. Others were calculated all by myself. Offensive penalties per game is not an official stat, so I couldn’t give you a ranking.

Explanatory Note: These stats, unless noted otherwise, are provided by Pro Football Focus (PFF). Also note that I’ve provided three different quarterback rating. The traditional NFL model, which most agree is flawed (Read about it HERE). ESPN’s rating, which ”is a statistical measure that incorporates the contexts and details of those throws and what they mean for wins,” (Read about it HERE). And PFF’s rating, which is takes the traditional NFL formula and changes the statistical inputs (Read about it HERE).


Explanatory Note: Defense-adjusted Value Over Average (DVOA) is a stat developed by Football Outsiders (FO). According to FO, DVOA “takes every single play during the NFL season and compares each one to a league-average baseline based on situation,” and “it gives a more accurate picture of how much better (or worse) a team really is relative to the rest of the league.” To read DVOA, know that the lower the total score, the better the defense (Zero represents average). If a team’s DVOA is in the negative, that defense is good. If it’s in the positive, the defense is bad. Weighted DVOA is adjusted to give more weight to more recent games. That is, games earlier in the season do not affect a team’s DVOA as much as later games. Read more about DVOA HERE.
I’ve given you both. “Weighted Through Week Played” represents the opponent’s weighted DVOA during the week of the matchup. “Overall” is the team’s current, unweighted DVOA. I’ve also given you rank, which is a very easy means of determining the quality of an opponent both at the time of the match up and now.
Commentary
I still believe that my original conclusion holds true: Kaepernick is no worse than Smith and Smith is no better than Kaepernick. They are, in essence, the exact same quarterback. That said, there are few stats I want to highlight.
The first of which is attempts of 20+ yards. Kaepernick has attempted nearly twice as many passes of 20+yards than Smith. Over the past four season, Smith threw such passes on just 9.67% of his total attempts. This isn’t necessarily an indictment of Smith’s ability, but it does reinforce the notion that Smith isn’t much of a risk taker. His unwillingness to take risks could hurt the team in two ways: defenses can focus on short and intermediate routes and it impedes the 49ers from putting up points quickly. It also makes it infinitely more difficult to stay awake while watching the team.
Despite being pressured more, Kaepernick takes fewer sacks. This could be related to Kaepernick’s athleticism, but Smith was pretty mobile himself. I think this difference is really the result of one of the biggest criticisms of Smith: How quickly he becomes uncomfortable in the pocket. Kaepernick seems willing to stay in the pocket to deliver the throw, where as Smith is more likely to take the sack.
The final stat I want to highlight is average yards per attempt (YPA). According to Kerry J. Byrne of Cold, Hard Football Facts, YPA is the single greatest indicator of success. Bryne found that:
- Teams that win the passing YPA battle almost always win the game.
- Teams that lose the passing YPA battle almost always lose the game.
- The winningest teams in history are typically the teams with the best passing YPA average
- The winningest quarterbacks in history are typically the quarterbacks with the best passing YPA average
For his career, Smith averages just 6.6 YPA. With Harbaugh, the number (7.5) is substantially better. Even still, Kaepernick’s trumps Smith and everyone else in the league.What’s even more impressive is that Kaepernick has gained nearly 62% of his yardage in the air. This currently ranks him fourth in the league. The three players above him in this ranking average 6.3, 7.3, and 7.9 YPA respectively. This suggests that Kaepernick is less dependent upon his wide receivers for yardage and more accurate on intermediate and deep route.
That said, while Kaepernick perhaps the better passer, the 49ers offense has declined. The team is averaging fewer first downs and a shorter average time of possession. The running game has stalled to some degree as well. Frank Gore hasn’t eclipsed 100 yards since Week 7 and the team yards per carry has shrunk more than 1.5 yards since Kaepernick took over as the starter. A number of factors could contribute to this decline, such as injury and opponent value, but one factor must be Kaepernick’s management of the run game and the team.
As some readers have pointed out, the most troubling aspect of starting Kaepernick is that we don’t know his floor. That is, we don’t know how bad he can be. But thus far, Kaepernick has acquitted himself well as the starter. He has obvious deficiencies, as any young quarterback does. Even with them, he hasn’t shown his floor is anything worse than untimely mistakes. In other words, he has yet to completely lose a game for the team. Even in the loss to St. Louis where his errors were converted to points by his opponent, Kaepernick still gave the team a chance to win.
And that speaks to the heart of the debate: Which quarterback gives the team a better chance at victory? The one who’s the better passer, or the one who’s the better game manager?














49ers Hot Read
49ersnews.com
49erswebzone.com
Niner Insider
Athletics Nation
95.7 FM The Game
Bay Area Sports Talk
Popblerd
Ray Ratto – CSNBA
Ruthless Sports
Giants Extra
Giants Talk
Giants365.com
GiantsPod
Optioned to Fresno
Fangraphs
Pro Football Talk
Feltbot's Warriors Blog
Joe Lacob & Co. [libelous slander]
WarriorsCentral.com

The writer has to remember when you pass the ball down the field more often with more yardage per play, you get less first downs, less time on the field, and less pass and running attempts. So yes Alex can pass for 6 yards per pass 12 times in a drive and gain 6 first downs, use more clock, have more chances to run the ball... Kap can throw the ball for 20 yards per pass 4 times and have only 3 first downs with less opportunity to run the ball (because of the field eating 40 yarder)
BASG, do you happen to have the team turnover data for Smith games vs Kaep games? I can't seem to find it, but my memory leads me to believe that Kaep benefitted from more turnovers by the D/ST (Saints game, anyone?), while also getting lucky that his many fumbles were recovered... I think this might be the most telling statistic as to his inexperience and his biggest negative quality in comparison to Alex.
It seems that the defensive turnovers forced would affect wins and our approach (if up we call plays one way, if down we call them another way) - but I don't see how it could change the stats, except in artificial ways, like more running out the clock plays (running instead of passing). Also being down would have meant more passing to a prevent defense perhaps, which could lead to more TDs or more INTs. So I don't know what this would do to the stats overall.
I wonder if the Niners would now have Harbaugh if they had drafted Aaron Rodgers. I also think it will be interesting to see what Alex can do on another team. For his sake, I hope he picks a team with a strong defense/conservative offense rather than going for the most money. That being said, I wouldn't mind seeing him in Arizona - it would really ratchet up that rivalry.
Considering that Arizona finished the season with their 4th QB (who wasn't even on the roster as the start of the season, iirc), and how many times in recent history something like that has happened to them in particular, it's a fair bet the Cardinals will be QB shopping. But it's probably a reasonable bet for more than a few teams -- Alex is a better QB than at least a couple teams' starter, and certainly better than most backups. The Giants still have David Carr carrying the clipboard behind Eli, for goodness sake. I admire their courage. But whether Alex will play for backup money is a different matter. I'd expect him to be playing elsewhere next season, for a team who needs a solid starter they can plug in at QB, and draft/trade for their other needs without breaking the proverbial bank.
not sure why we are even talking about this.... Go Kap Go Niners....
Bye week, need to talk about something and there's still enough people who think Alex was wronged to make good conversation (I'm not accusing EBSG of trying to stir the pot or anything, just an observation).
Definitely trying to stir the pot. :) Also, hoping to give context to the Kap/Smith debate--at least what's left of it. After listening to some of the callers on KNBR and The Game last week, I thought people could use the information.
When comparing their stats, it's also notable that CK completed 23 passes of 20+ yds to Smith's 13 for balls that were thrown deep. In other words, those yards have a lot more to do with the passer than shorter passes where the receiver breaks free for a long gain. It would also be good to somehow quantify the value of throwing the ball away to avoid a sack or an interception. Not sure how to do that, but that is often a good play but tends to count against the QB.
I didn't explain it in the article, but I should have. Accuracy Percentage accounts for drops and throw aways. CK, surprisingly, has thrown the ball away 13 times while Smith did so only 9 times. I thought that number would be reversed.
That's good to know. And regarding throw aways, I did expect CK to have a higher number than AS. I think that keeps in line with sack avoidance.
Harbaugh has enjoyed enormous trust and "buy-in" from team and fans. He put that on the line making the sort of change other coaches only make in a losing streak. It's hard to justiify unless you get a huge upgrade . . . So far, results are not especially impressive, and therefore he's probably not going to win any coach of the year awards unless we win the SB. The Alex intangibles are very strong team elements--intelligence and leadership, especially. These do show up in stat lines but you have to look for them.
Great read! Would say the decline is easily due to the quality of teams we have faced and to the fact that Colin hasn't been getting 1st team reps like Alex was so he wasn't as familiar with the guys. I feel while both are more than capable QBs that Colin adds the dimensions of his legs an ability to push the ball downfield with his arm which now and in the long term makes us a better and more dangerous offense.
Revealing numbers, EBSG. Numbers don't lie. But they also don't tell the whole story. Certain numbers make someone look good. Certain numbers make someone look bad. You have to understand numbers within the context of how they were obtained. But if you take the numbers you have highlighted as gospel (I don't, but will for the sake of argument), then Kap and Smith have basically the same influence on the outcome of the game. The real difference is that Kap is future and Alex is the past. So all things being equal, you would rather have your QB of the future running things. If you accept that they are both at the same level, then you don't lose anything now by playing Kap, but the experience he gains will help you in the future.
I disagree. If CK was just another version of AS, AS would be starting based on his experience. I think the point of the article and analysis is that CK is just as effective as AS while also being able to do more. The 'more' in this case is better escapability, a better downfield running threat, and a much more accurate downfield passer. These values are harder to demonstrate with stats.
Ratto mentioned this very article on "Bay Area Sports Guy" during the drive time segment of KNBR this evening -- right around 6pm, I believe. No big shout-out or anything, but it was obvious Ratto had read EBSG's article, and apparently thought well enough of the analysis to mention it.
[...] Here's a pretty detailed breakdown and somewhat detailed analysis: Bay Area Sports Guy – Numbers don’t lie: Revisiting the statistical comparison between S... [...]
+1 is for Reggie Write.
EBSG, Unlike initially, I agree that your statistical analysis is fair and thorough in comparing the performance of CK and Smith statistically. I also accept your conclusion that Kaepernick is no worse than Smith and Smith is no better than Kaepernick. Now, in my opinion, and I think you'd agree, CK hasn't been as sensational as he appeared in the games against NO and Chicago. He hasn't ignited the offense particularly overall, but I can't say that Smith would have done any better or worse. My general feeling about this whole thing is that CK has a bright future and may well be a great QB for the Niners for years to come. But the way this all came down sucks. I think that Smith was entitled to keep his job after the concussion. The team was doing as well when he went out as they are doing now. I knew Harbaugh was a bull shitter like all NFL coaches have to be BUT after all the "I love Alex Smith" BS, to pull something like this is still eye opening to me. I doubt this was lost on the rest of the players either. It's hard to imagine they can really like or trust him after this. However, maybe a coach doesn't have to be loved. Maybe it's better if he's feared. Maybe this will yield greater success. We'll have to see. I used to like Harbaugh, now I don't. If the team succeeds in the playoffs, Harbaugh will be vindicated. Either way, CK will be the QB next year and Alex will be somewhere else.
+1, nice comments.
You are not entitled to anything. You do lose your job to injury if the next man up is deemed to bring more to the table. Sucks, but that's professional sports. If the Colts can kick Peyton Manning to the curb for an injury, nobody is safe. It's a harsh reality, but that's the world we live in.
Well, Peyton Manning wasn't replaced because they thought Luck was better, he was replaced either because they thought he couldn't medically play or Luck is the future and therefore move on to him since he's ready. Without the injury, they couldn't have moved on. Without the concussion, Harbaugh could have. Peyton didn't lose his job in the same way Smith did because no one thought Smith wouldn't overcome a concussion like Peyton overcoming a neck injury. You later said "if you're not winning, you'll be replaced" - Alex was winning. It's just that Harbaugh thought he'd have a better chance in the future - which is different than saying, "if you're not winning." We lost to the Giants but beat Green Bay, I know, the defenses are different, but I only agree with Harbaugh as to the future, not in that Alex wasn't winning, etc. I know this is a bit weak of me, but I wish Harbaugh had just said that "it wasn't an easy decision but I'm going with Kaep". He doesn't like to say anything to the media so he just said that he was going with Kaep and that he had plowed the land as much as he can (as far as explaining it). It just seemed wrong despite being the right decision (if he felt Alex gave him the best chance, then that would have been the right decision). I don't want Harbaugh leading the guy he thinks does not give him the best chance.
Fitz, I think you're right about players not being entitled to anything. What I'm saying is that in my opinion it was a really lousy thing to do and changes the way I feel about Harbaugh and how I'll feel about the team going forward. I suppose the Colts didn't have to give Pagano his job back after coming back from chemotherapy. Let's say the Colts told Pagano that they're glad he's feeling better but Ariens did such a great job while he was gone, they decided to stick with Ariens. Pagano could watch the remaining games from up in the press box while Ariens would continue as head coach. Let's say the Colts did that and went on to win the Super Bowl. If I were a Colts fan and that happened, it sure would change the way I felt about the team. I'd probably still root for them but I wouldn't feel as invested in the team or enjoy their success as much. That's the same way I feel about Harbaugh and the Niners now. I'm still a fan, but less so. And any post-season success won't be as enjoyable as last year.
It's exactly the same thing. It's about a person losing his job under unusual and arguably unfair circumstances. What difference does it make that one is a coach and one is an athlete? One could analogize to someone working in another field altogether so long as performance is all that matters. The fact you disagree with me is your prerogative but the analogy holds. Jim Irsay hypothetically saying, I think Bruce Ariens gives us the best chance of winning in the playoffs would be no different than Harbaugh saying that CK gives the Niners the best chance of winning in the playoffs. In both cases, it's harsh but done with the intent to win a championship.
That's not the same thing at all. You're talking about a coach vs. an athlete. That's also not a zero-sum kind of deal, they could have both of them still there, revisiting roles if they felt it was appropriate. QB is a zero-sum deal, rarely do you see more than one QB getting a substantial chunk of the plays. It doesn't change how I feel at all. If it changes the way you feel, maybe you should watch more kids sports where everyone gets a trophy. I think Damon Bruce sums it up best with his saying to the effect of "They're looking to replace you from the first day you step on the field and will the second they get a chance". That's being a professional athlete, and that's just how it goes. If you're that good, you won't get replaced when you're out with an injury. If you are and it still happens, you can get another job.
Fitz is spot on. Alex didn't lose his starting role due to injury. He lost his starting role because Harbaugh believes Kap gives the 49ers a better chance to win. Its that simple. The NFL is about winning now, not loyalty. They don't have guaranteed contracts, they don't take care of the players after they retire. You win now, or you lose your job. Was it a risky decision? Of course it was. But you'd have to think Harbaugh felt strongly enough about it that he was willing to accept the risks.
I agree: He hasn't been what he was in the CHI or NO games (perhaps last week he was though). Still, he's been pretty good. I also agree that the way he got the job is suspect. Players shouldn't lose their position because of injury. However, I do think Harbaugh was actively looking for a reason to move on from Smith. I mean, Kap's performance against CHI wasn't enough to bench Smith. There must have been something more. It's just unfortunate/horrible it happened the way it did.
He wasn't too shabby against the Pats either when he was NFC Offensive player of the week playing in Foxborough in December in the freezing rain. I think he's been reasonably consistent performance wise, but unfortunately inconsistent from one series to the next. Part of that is on him, but let's face it, the Alex run offense had the same feature. I think a lot of it has to do with Roman's weaknesses as a coach of an overly finetuned offense in which every play is so overdesigned it's either perfect or a flop. That's an exaggeration, but there's a substantial truth there.
Good points. Some of the struggles/inconsistency could be the result of inconsistency in play calling. Ruthless Sports Guy wrote something similar to that last week.
I agree Kaep is the present and the future. The fly in the ointment are the interceptions he's avoided because Crabtree or Moss have broken up passes. He could easily have 3 or 4 more interceptions this year. But the kid is smart, has the arm, athletic talent and pocket presence to be a top 10 NFL QB his entire career. Looking forwards to watching him grow.
Top 10 QB? There are already 3 rookie QB's better than Kaep. He's the 3rd best QB in a 4 team division and if Alex goes to Arizona with a chip on his shoulder next year Kaep could be the worst QB in the NFC West. Unless he changes his delivery and learns to get rid of the ball quicker, Kaep will throw many INTs in his career. I just hope it doesn't start in the playoffs. The good news is...we get to watch it all unfold over the next few weeks. The good, the bad and the Harbaugh.
"He’s the 3rd best QB in a 4 team division and if Alex goes to Arizona with a chip on his shoulder next year Kaep could be the worst QB in the NFC West." Really!? What are you smoking? I'd take Kaep over any of them in a heartbeat. And PLEASE let alex go to AZ. I relish the thought of crushing smith at Arizona twice a year as he reverts to his same old self with the Cards. Of course, we can't be surprised when smith wants to stay in San Fran to "finish what he started". That's the old excuse that we kept hearing from smith's camp every time he took less money to stay in SF because he couldn't get a half decent offer from another team. In reality, smith is the 49ers bitch. He knows what will happen if he plays for another team and so do we. He leaves; he becomes an afterthought and bounces from starter to bench for the rest of his career. No QB will EVER be given as much time with one team to try to prove himself as smith has with San Fran. And even after 8 years, he never looked better than adequate. No one gets excited for a game quarterbacked by alex smith. Be honest, NOTHING smith did this year makes you think that he could have won all the games that Kaep did down the stretch. They may look similar on paper, on the field they are worlds apart.
Numbers often do lie.I personally prefer the eyeball test which anyone except .maybe Stevie Wonder would say shows Kap is the vastly superior QB in nearly every way !
The eyeball test is what's led people to believe guys like Jeff George and Jay Cutler are quality QBs in spite of their numbers. People tend to praise QBs that have good arms, and underrate QBs that play smart and safe football. Usually some combination of observation and stats is preferable. I'd agree Kap is a better option going forward, but they're about equal right now all things considered.
The eyeball test does reveal things like CK rolling out to his left and throwing 30-yard lasers across his body right on the money for 50 yard touchdowns, like he did last week. I think the only thing keeping him from being head and shoulders above Alex is (like EBSG has pointed out) his ability to call plays at the line of scrimmage and run the offense at the point of attack. I think Kaep needs to be cut a little bit more slack because he didn't become a starter until the second half of the season when the 49ers schedule happened to get a lot tougher. Russell Wilson didn't exactly light the NFL on fire in the first half of the year but by now he's showing he'll probably be one of the top QBs in the league for next 10 years. Imagine how much further along Kapernick would be had he started the entire season.
cosigned.
I'd rather take chances on Kaepernick because of the high ceiling...his athleticism is unmatched by Alex Smith.
Kap has played 4 of 6 starts away from home. The 'bad' defenses he's faced- New England and New Orleans- were both playing far better in the second half of the season when they met than in the first half, and both were on the road. The only more difficult division matchup Alex had that was more difficult than what Kap's faced was the Cardinals, against whom, as it's been noted, we match up well. And Kap has yet to face a creampuff like Buffalo or Detroit. I agree the stats aren't that differentiated, and that Kap has struggled running the offense from the point of view of 'having it all under control' versus Smith, but he has outplayed him in many other contexts, including deep throws, outs, elusiveness against the rush (evaded a few sacks against Arizona and threw the ball away) and, of course, running the football. Matchup adjusted, I think it's pretty clear Kap outplayed Smith this year.
"And Kap has yet to face a creampuff like Buffalo or Detroit." For what its worth, New Orleans just had one of the worst defensive seasons in NFL history. They're the creamiest and puffiest defense in the league.
New Orleans is not a great D, no doubt, but they're a different D in that dome of theirs (av 26 pts allowed) than outside of it (31 pts allowed), and especially after that team's terrible September (av 23 pts allowed). The numbers bear out the stronger strength of schedule Kaepernick has faced: http://espn.go.com/blog/nflnation/post/_/id/69661/wilson-bradford-gain-in-adjusted-qbr And that doesn't include the degree to which the offense has been weakened by injuries since Kap took over. So, point stands.
...and Arizona .... cream-puffs for all.....
Arizona is considered a good defense. Miami fell off at the end of the season, but they are certainly not a "creampuff".
Cream-puff Dolphins, too!
The big X factor here is reading the defense and changing into the correct play. I believe Smith was better at this, which only makes sense because he had all of last season behind center. This would explain why the run game was more successful with him in there.
Actually, the run game tapered off last year too, having to do with Gore (if you pay close attention, you'll notice he takes himself out of games a lot more in the second half of this and last season). We also lost Hunter and Manningham for most of Kap's starts. Those two guys had huge roles in this offense this year. The adjustments thing has some truth to it, but is ultimately speculative and I think overblown.
Picking up Brandon Jacobs was for this very reason, to lower the load on Gore and to keep him fresh for now. Guess Harbs forgot why he got him?
I think it's a confluence of events too. I noted that here and wrote as much a few weeks ago: http://www.bayareasportsguy.com/is-frank-gore-wearing-down/. Still, I think Kap deserves part of the blame. In an interview with Eric Davis, Ted Robinson noted that Gore mentioned he was never sure when he was going to run the ball with Kap until he was actually running it. And so, I think that Kap struggles with calling the game. But, it's a correctable issue, I'm sore.
Agree with this. I think that it plays a role, but it's ridiculous to say that's the entire reason for Gore's production going down. Honestly, Gore just has not looked as good in the second part of the season. I think its a combination of the opponents, Gore slowing down a bit, injuries and what he's able to do at the line. Regardless, that's very correctable and I have no doubt it'll be addressed over time.
Agreed. This would also explain the 49ers' worse offensive numbers with Kap.
I would be curious to know how many times Kap throws the ball away. It affects his completion percentage and lowers the sack number. Seems that Alex was more willing to take the sack than to throw it away. Thoughts?
Curious to know how the stats would have looked IF Crabtree actually hustled when Alex QB'd and wasn't resentful of Alex when he was on his prima donna as$ for screwing off pre-season camps?
Kap threw the ball away 13 times, where as Smith only did so 9 times. Accuracy % takes into account balls thrown away and drops.
Trackbacks