The mid-summer classic is here, and I thought it would be fun to break out my series projection model to handicap each leagues odds.
I’ve had to make some minor adjustments to the way that I normally do things because the All-Star game is pretty different from a regular season game.
Here is a quick description of how the model works and what changes I made to take into account the differences from the regular season for the All-Star game:
- I started by using the Lineup Analysis tool from Baseball Musings to get the run scored projections for each team based on their starting lineups. Obviously these guys don’t play together everyday, and this should give a rough estimate of what to expect. I wasn’t sure how to account for the reserves, so just know that I made no adjustment and that could be a factor in accuracy of the projection.
- For the pitching, I assumed that both starting pitchers will go two innings, and then it will go to the bullpen. Again, because I can not forecast with any real accuracy who will pitch and how many innings, I took the total season stat line for each pitcher and created a bullpen FIP for each league to complete the game.
- The data used in the projection model is based on the current season’s statistics to date.
- The estimated run differential is then converted into a projected winning percentage using the pythagorean expectation.
- Then, it’s converted into an odds of winning the game using the log5 method developed by Bill James
- I have removed the home field advantage factor because with just one Royal represented, I am not comfortable saying that any one team would have a measurable advantage at what is essentially a neutral ball park
Here is how the model breaks everything breaks down when each is up against an “average” team:
| Runs Scored | |
| American | 6.353 |
| National | 6.530 |
The National league has a slight advantage in projected runs scored. Most of that comes from the advantage that they get from their first five batters all having an OBP above .380 compared to just two of the first five for the AL team. Overall, the NL has the better starting player at six of the nine spots when you look at wRC+. Both are very good offensive teams but with a slight edge to the NL.
| Runs Allowed | ||||
| Starter | Bullpen | Defense | Total | |
| American | 0.653 | 2.450 | 0.326 | 3.429 |
| National | 0.693 | 2.318 | 0.054 | 3.065 |
In the battle of the starting pitchers the AL has the slight advantage. Justin Verlander edges Matt Cain in expected runs given up in the two innings I expected each to go. When the game goes to the bullpen, the edge moves to the NL. It will be interesting to see how each manager utilizes the reserve pitchers.
The NL has a pretty big edge in the defense of the starters with a .25 run advantage, but this is something that should really be taken with a grain of salt. The defensive metrics have a high level of uncertainty, and it also doesn’t take into account that these players don’t play together regularly, or what the reserves might be able to contribute defensively. I included them here for illustrative purposes, but for the odds in the game, I have removed them.
| Winning Percentage | |
| American | .753 |
| National | .797 |
Overall, the NL is the slightly better team. If they played a full 162 game schedule, they would win nearly 130 games. For comparison, the AL would be expected to be around a 122 win team.
When all is said and done the NL is the favorite, they should be expected to win around 53 percent of the time.














49ers Hot Read
49ersnews.com
49erswebzone.com
Niner Insider
Athletics Nation
95.7 FM The Game
Bay Area Sports Talk
Popblerd
Ray Ratto – CSNBA
Ruthless Sports
Giants Extra
Giants Talk
Giants365.com
GiantsPod
Optioned to Fresno
Fangraphs
Pro Football Talk
Feltbot's Warriors Blog
Joe Lacob & Co. [libelous slander]
WarriorsCentral.com

I have to admit, that might be the greatest statistical breakdown of a "showcase" game in the history of internet blogging in the San Francisco Bay Area at 1pm in the afternoon that I have ever seen. Can we please go back to making this game not determine home field advantage? Who cares if it ends in a tie, of all the major sports, baseball's schedule would be the most appropriate to end in ties. Jesus, they play 162 games- I say call games after the 12th if no one has scored. I remember a few years ago the Padres played a 23 inning game in April or early May- and their pitching staff never bounced back all year. Nobody likes ties- but the fact that you get elected to an all-star team and never get a chance to play is silly. Even when I play the All-star game in a video game I sub in every single player (generally the computer does not). I remember back when I was a kid there was a big fuss that Albert Belle was the only player not used, but now- multiple players go unused and no one says a thing. For instance, your starter tonight- Matt Cain is at the all-star game for the 3rd time- but this is the first time he will see action. I would rather see all players get a chance to play and risk a tie than not see every player. Do we really need a 15 inning all-star game anyway? At what point would we draw the limit? Even football games tie for gods sake. BTW- best part of the all-star game is that teams wear their own uniforms- unlike the NBA or NFL (who wear just the helmets)- that's probably my favorite part- when all the players are lined up wearing their respective home whites or road grays. NL gets 3 in a row- they win 10 - 6. Giants get homefield and face the Rangers in the World Series again.
Good stuff...and they end up letting Cain throw all 9 innings like in the old days because they don't want to disrupt his perfect game in the All Star game, even if it doesn't officially "count."