Remember Halloween, Raiders’ fans? The optimism. The debauchery. The our-team-has-just-won-two-out-of-their-last-three-and-the-one-loss-could-have-easily-been-a-victory-against-the-league’s-best-team-ery.
Ah, the memories.
Since then, the Raiders have fallen into a veritable black hole. They’ve lost their last two games in embarrassing fashion, giving up 934 yards on defense (they had given up 794 over the previous three weeks) and committing 19 penalties for 185 yards. The reasons for this drastic change are multiple, of course. They seem to be ever shifting. If it’s not the run defense, it’s the coverage. If it’s not the coverage, it’s the pass rush. If it’s not the pass rush, it’s the… well, you get the point.
I could attempt to break down all the issues and suggest possible changes. But doing so would be a fool’s errand (is that a saying?). Plus, in case you haven’t noticed, I’m not a coach. In any case, I thought it might be interesting to see just how egregious the penalties and defensive play have been. I’m a sadistic blogger, I guess.
The Penalties
vs Tampa Bay
In Tampa Bay’s first drive, Raider penalties gave the Bucs 30 free yards and two first downs, which the Buccaneers would use to kick a field goal.
On their second possession of the 3rd quarter, the Buccaneers were given another free first down after Lamarr Houston committed a neutral zone infraction on third down. The extra series of downs would result in a touchdown.
vs Baltimore
During the Ravens’ third series of the second quarter, a Philip Wheeler penalty turned what would have been a three-and-out into a field goal.
The Ravens’ first series of the third quarter saw Wheeler again extend the Ravens drive with a face mask penalty. Were it not for the penalty, the Ravens would have need to convert on third-and-two. But the fresh set of downs allowed Flacco to connect with Torrey Smith for a 47 yard touchdown.
In their third series of the third quarter, the Ravens were gifted an five yards on a third-and-eight thanks to a neutral zone infraction by Lamarr Houston. That five yards made the Sam Koch touchdown run possible.
The Defense
Defensive Tackle
Against Tampa Bay, Tommy Kelly was on the field for 26 of the Bucanneers’ 32 rush attempts. He registered 0 tackles and 0 stops (tackles that result in an offensive failure). Richard Seymour faired slightly better, registering 18 snaps against the run and two tackles, both which resulted in stops.
Against Baltimore, Kelly was on the field for 20 of the Ravens’ 28 rush attempts. He again registered 0 tackles and 0 stops. In contrast, Desmond Bryant registered 21 snaps and five tackles, two of which resulted in stops. And, Christo Bilukidi played 11 snaps, registering two tackles, both of which result in stops.
Also, it’s worth noting that in 53 pass rush snaps, Kelly produced just 1 pressure. For comparison, in only 22 snaps, Desmond Bryant registered 2 pressures.
Defensive End
Against Tampa Bay, Lamarr Houston and Matt Shaughnessy combined to play 52 snaps against the pass. They generated six total pressures, none of which were sacks.
Against Baltimore, in 53 pass rush snaps, Houston and Shaughnessy combined for only four pressures, none of which were sacks. Andre Carter faired much better, generating two pressures in just 12 attempts.
Shaughnessy above all has struggled significantly, even without considering his inability to effectively rush the passer. Against the run, Shaughnessy registered 42 snaps, achieving just one tackle, which was good for a stop, and two missed tackles (both came against Tampa Bay).
Linebackers
Surprisingly, Rolando McClain might have been the Raiders’ best linebacker over the past two games — against the run, anyway. He’s logged a total of 47 snaps against the run, earning a total of six tackles and five stops. His stop percentage (percentage of plays that resulted in a stop) against Tampa Bay ranked him in the top-10 among middle linebackers.
Outside linebackers Miles Burris and Philip Wheeler have been effective rushing the passer in limited opportunities. They’ve notched five total pressures in 28 attempts. Though that’s only 17% pressure rate, it’s on par with other 4-3 linebackers.
Where they’ve struggled is against the run. In 104 total snaps, the duo has generated seven tackles, five of which constituted stops. And, they have combined for four missled tackles.
In coverage, they’ve been worse — if you can believe that. Not only has the duo missed four combined tackles, but they’ve also been missing their coverage assignments. Receivers being covered by either Wheeler or Burris were targeted a total of 18 times. Of those 18 attempts, quarterbacks completed 18 passes for 194 yards, of which 133 yards came after the catch.
Cornerbacks
Against Tampa Bay, ex-Raider Pat Lee missed three tackles (two against the run, one in coverage). That might explain his release. Joselio Hanson, on the other hand, has played well over the past two weeks. He’s been targeted six times and allowed only two receptions for 26 yards. Michael Huff has not played well. Huff has been targeted 14 times, allowing eight receptions for 212 yards and two scores.
Safeties
Against the run, no Raider has been better than Tyvon Branch. In 56 snaps, Branch registered 10 tackles, four of which were stops. In coverage, Branch has only been targeted twice, both of which went for receptions.But where Branch has excelled, Matt Giordano has floundered. Against Baltimore, Giordano was targeted five times. Three went for completions, two were touchdowns.
What It All Means
The Raiders’ penalties cost the team a total of 27 points. The ten points given to Tampa Bay would have effected the outcome of the game. The effect on the Baltimore game isn’t as obvious, though a 17 point swing might have affected the game in the Raiders’ favor.
The systemic failure to stop opposing teams either in coverage or against the run is alarming, as are the sheer number of missed tackles. How a group of professional athletes, who had been playing at an above average level the previous three weeks, could regress so drastically is beyond comprehension. The only logical explanation I can come up with revolves around coaching. After watching the Rams, who are equally short on talent, outplay the 49ers last week, I can only wonder whether Dennis Allen is getting the most out of his players. If Sundays’ game against New Orleans ends similarly to the past two, then the simply answer will be: No. And that’s a depressing thought.















49ers Hot Read
49ersnews.com
49erswebzone.com
Niner Insider
Athletics Nation
95.7 FM The Game
Bay Area Sports Talk
Popblerd
Ray Ratto – CSNBA
Ruthless Sports
Giants Extra
Giants Talk
Giants365.com
GiantsPod
Optioned to Fresno
Fangraphs
Pro Football Talk
Feltbot's Warriors Blog
Joe Lacob & Co. [libelous slander]
WarriorsCentral.com

You know the Raiders under Allen? They remind me of a junkyard car..just rusty parts and then assembled like a teen would. Not a classic car restoration. The Raiders..just rusty, greasy,oily, car parts. The last two years they had at least a passable classic car look,if not a show winner.
Mark Davis said he knew things would be changed...but he didn't expect regression. And he didn't sound too happy. A rookie coach for the Raiders was a bad idea..Cable,Kiffin, and Allen..too young or too old. Hue..anybody guessed he would be missed this badly? I did.
This is embarrassing, as a Raider fan I can't even talk about my team in any work place conversations. Their is no pride on the field and these guys have tanked for this year. 8 and 8 seams so long ago.
I would have thought the blackouts would be back by now. Raider fans..are faithful. More faithful then any others.
They're greatly benefitting from adopting the new 85% rule the NFL put in place recently.
what makes things most frustrating is that for the past two seasons, the Raiders have finished 8-8 and were competitive till late December. Now, its mid-November and it would be a huge stretch to say they're competitive.
The raiders need a franchise player so being bad is not so bad. If they can get #1 pick and get a franchise player, then it is worth it. Look at the Colts with Luck. Colts were bad last year but now, they might make the playoffs this year. It is the right way to rebuild a team in sports unless you picked a dumbass like Russell.
The Raiders roster is so horrible right now, they need 3 top 30 picks and not a franchise player, they're depleted on the o-line, def backfield, linebacker .... and the list goes on
They thought McFadden was that guy before the season started. Now there most appealing players seem to be Jano and Shane. That's a sobering thought.
Reggie wanted a clean slate...too bad the Raiders best players don't have the time Reggie needed to re build the team..his huge mistake. By the time Allen has any idea what it take to build a team?..he will of course be doing it for another franchise. Reggie overdid the cleanhouse when he never even spoke to Hue. Once again a huge ego -Reggie's- backfires.
Reggie Mac HAD to clean house, every new NFL GM does it....next to fall will be Seymour and Kelly
Honestly, how bad the Raiders are doesn't surprise me one bit. Coming close with a good team and beating two of the very worst teams in the league does not suddenly make you a good team. I'm sure they'll come around eventually, but they still gotta finish cleaning the mess Al Davis made and it might take awhile. Also, from what I've seen I'm not a big fan of their coach. The Niners probably would have recovered from Donahue's mess faster if they had not hired that idiot Singletary.
Yeah, I agree with you about Dennis Allen. Yes, it's his first year but I'm not sure if the Raiders will go far with him as their head coach. I'm sorry. No offense to the Raiders, but Allen was an uninspiring hire. I'm probably one of the select few who thought they should've kept Hue Jackson. Yeah, you can't blame the Raiders for wanting to bring in a whole new regime, but the team played hard for Jackson last year, and the offense looked better when he was there. Plus, he almost took them to the playoffs. I really think he deserved one more year. I guess when he said he was pissed at the team, his fate with the Raiders was probably sealed. Yes, he loved himself a little too much, but the guy did a decent job coaching the Raiders last year, considering all they went through last year (the death of Al Davis, penalties in a lot of the games, not having McFadden for most of last season, Campbell being out for a good portion of last season, trading for Palmer and trying to implement him into their offense, etc.). Most/a lot of coaches probably would've failed under all of those circumstances. Time will tell on Allen, but the more I think about it, his hiring kind of reminds me of the Lane Kiffin hire, even though he's not an idiot like Lane Kiffin though. LOL. Allen actually seems like a good guy, even though he might be a little too serious. The Allen hire reminds of of the Kiffin hire because he wasn't well known and no one really knows what to expect out of him. It just seemed like there were better head coaching options including Jackson. But yeah, I would've given Jackson another year. It will be interesting if he gets another head coaching job somewhere. Damon Bruce mentioned Cal if Tedford gets fired, but we'll see. I think Hue Jackson deserves another chance to be a head coach again.
Hue Jackson is a scam. With Al on his death bed, Hue tried to pull a powerplay ( "Al whispered that I hold the keys to the kingdom ..." ) , and Mark Davis called bullshit. Hue's now back with the Bengals coaching the DB's; hahahahahahah..... Otis, I always respect your comments, but you and I will have to agree to disagree on this one.
Yeaaahhh...Well, we still have cool unis?
Kate Scott has more guts then McFadden. "High sprain"..John Fogertys old song "Centerfold"?.."Put me in coach" ..it goes. McFadden in a whiny voice:..." I cant do it,my ankle hurts coach".
And if this blog welcomed blue humor? What I could say about McFadden...make Richard Priors ghost blush.
je-je...spellcheck. Centerfield..you knew.
Gannon was on the Drive today and said the Raiders are paying for Al's mistakes both in personnel and salary and it will be that way for a while. I agree and ( can't believe it) agree with Tierney's assertion that they should cut loose the highest paid punter and kicker and use that excess money for badly needed talent.
Gannon is 100% correct. Davis never hired scouts because he was a GENIUS, and when high draft picks flopped, he always had a lackey he could blame it on. The dollars he paid Asomugha, Tommy Kelly, DHB, Stanford Routt, Seymour, Javon Walker, Deangelo Hall .... he has completely DESTROYED the salary cap structure and left the cupboard bare. Good for Mark Davis for falling on the grenade yesterday, he's going to be a GREAT owner
Tierney is half right... Yes the Raiders would benefit by shedding HUGE salaries... but, I don't see how getting rid of their best players (at ANY position) makes them better- aside from the money... but if the 2011 NFC Championship taught us anything Special Teams wins and loses it. They need to do what good teams do... build thru the draft... unfortunately, they traded their draft for Carson Palmer... Janikowski and Lechler do kind of go to waste on the Raiders--- (no offense), you know what I mean by that.
Raider fans are an interesting breed... regardless of team record, temperature, facilities or opponent- they come dressed in spikes and face paint... love the passion. and I'm sure spirit halloween store appreciates the business during the off season... I really wish they weren't the butt of every joke related to NFL awfulness for the past 7 years... proud franchise, great uniforms- even as a Niner fan (although I did go thru a phase where I claimed the raiders when I was 9, mostly out of pressure from the coaching staff of my PAL football team), they deserve WAY better. the past 2 weeks though, they look like the other team was in a different class- the loss to Baltimore, although bad (considering the Ravens are all on IR) is excusable, the Ravens are still the Ravens--- but the loss to Tampa (which you know chaps the ass of the entire Raider nation, given the super bowl blowout) isn't... they have a rookie head coach (at least in the NFL) too. The division was really kind of a toss up too, but now it looks like Denver could run away with it... and to make things worse... the Saints come marching in... Not considering offense or any other aspect of the game, would you rather have the Saints or Raiders defense? With the history of those franchises... did we ever think that would be a question? somewhere in heaven Al Davis vomitting on his Silver tracksuit.
As a mainstream yuppie Raider fan, I want to say we HATE the face paint Darth Raider Gorilla Zilla Black Hole jackoffs and wish they would go away. They live in their own private idaho
Just to fill in the casual observer, around 90% of the fans at the game don't dress in those outfits. The cameras just target them. Most fans just sport jerseys or the colors like every other fan base. You'll even see kids, old school Raider fans, etc.
I actually meant that comment to be a sign of their passion as opposed to insanity. But I understan your point.