Bud Selig did nothing to calm the unrest growing among Oakland fans on Thursday. When pressed for an A’s stadium update, Selig playfully responded, “You aren’t going to get a (expletive) answer.”
“I know people say ‘Gee, it should be easy to do,’” Selig continued. “Well, the more they’ve gotten into it, the more complicated it’s gotten. But we’re headed for resolution.”
Selig’s claim about the imminence of a resolution has been one he’s echoed for a decade, at least. Every time Selig reassures A’s fans of an impending stadium deal, an angel gets it’s wings. Unfortunately, these are angels of death, sent by Selig to kill stadium deals. Don’t worry though, they’re not violent. It’s only their apathy that’s lethal.
Over the past decade, Selig has continually clung to unwritten laws of “territorial rights,” noting that anarchy would exist without them. However, after the A’s deal with Fremont fell through, Selig promised to open all doors in all communities in his attempt to get the A’s a new ballpark? He set up a “blue ribbon committee” to investigate such moves. The result: Selig and his committee held secret meetings with the city of Oakland in August, despite early hinting at a significant progress in San Jose. In all, this apathy and ambivalence has resulted in the death of at least three stadium deals.
An abridged timeline of Selig’s (and Wolff’s) mal-handling of the stadium situation
1999
Bob Piccinini, owner of the Save Mart supermarkets, attempted to purchase the A’s, but was denied without explanation. Said Piccinini, “The biggest thing I remember was the huge disappointment. We had worked for close to a year, and through that whole process, we didn’t see anything that was a stumbling block. When the rejection occurred, I thought it was bogus. … I’ve got several suspicions, none of which I can validate.”
Piccinini wasn’t sure if his denial was the result of collusion between Selig and then co-owner Lew Wolf, or the work of persuasive San Francisco Giants’ executives. “I can tell you there’s an executive with the Giants, who shall go unnamed,” Piccinini continued. “I ran into him at a Warriors game. He said, ‘I hear you’re getting involved with the Padres. We want you in San Diego; we just didn’t want you here.’”
In any case, Piccinini, as suggested by the Modesto Bee, was a ready and willing owner who would have likely forged ahead with the team’s relationship with Oakland. In other words, we wouldn’t be talking about a new stadium for the A’s, we’d be sitting in it.
2001
The Santa Clara City Council began talks with the A’s regarding the possibility of the team moving to the South Bay. These preliminary talkes hinged on then A’s co-owner Steve Schott convincing Selig that a move to Santa Clara would not violate the Giants’ territorial rights. Months later, Selig reportedly had this to say at the Annual Congressional Baseball Game: “I watched 32 years ago the Kansas City A’s move to Oakland. They hurt the Giants badly. They never really did very well themselves. It was a horrible mistake.”
2004
A’s were making no head waves in moving to the South Bay. Then Giants’ president and managing general partner Peter Magowan effectively blocked any such move.
“Everybody knows what territorial rights you have when you buy a team,” Magowan said. “We certainly knew in 1992 what rights we had. The A’s knew what rights they had. We’ve stated very consistently that we will do everything within our power to enforce our rights because they have a lot of value. We might not have bought the franchise without those rights and the Commissioner has gone on the record as being fully supportive of us.”
2005
In discussing the sale of the then league-owned Nationals, Selig was asked about the territorial rights issue that had been plaguing the A’s. In response, Selig told reporters, “We have a sport where you just can’t have anarchy. You can’t be changing territories. It’s a territory that’s owned by the San Francisco Giants and that will be respected. You just don’t change those things and we won’t.”
The A’s are sold to Lew Wolff and an investment team, at which time Wolff claimed, “We’re not buying the team to move it.” Upon being asked about then San Jose Mayor Ron Gonzales promise to urge Wolff to move the A’s there, Wolf said, ”I’ll tell him our focus is on Oakland, we’re going to honor the territorial rules, and that’s the end of it.”
2006
The A’s officially announce plans to build a stadium in Fremont. Selig announces that ”San Jose is a dead issue.” “The thing that holds the sport together,” Selig continued, “is its own internal rules. If you start to break them, you’re going to have anarchy.”
2009
After meeting push back form Fremont city officials, the A’s abandon the Fremont stadium. Selig effectively then retracts his previous unwillingness to deal with the issue of territorial rights, saying, “It is important that we get some resolution in the near future. As a result, I’ve decided that in the event that you are not able to promptly assure the implementation of the desired ballpark in Fremont, you may begin to discuss a ballpark with other communities. The time has come for the A’s to have their own new ballpark.”
Selig sets up infamous “blue ribbon committee” to essentially make sense of the A’s stadium mess. The A’s begin serious negotiations with the city of San Jose.
2012
Selig tells reporters that the league is working at “a rather quick pace” in their attempt to resolve the the A’s stadium issues, particularly their desire to move to San Jose, which is in Giants’ territory. True to his words, in March, Selig notes that ”Both sides are deeply positioned and I am in the middle of trying to fashion some type of an agreement. It is very complicated.” Unfortunately, only one month later, Susan Sussler reports that the A’s were unable to get their stadium issue added to the agenda of the May owners’ meeting. According to Sussler, “MLB has no current plans to delve into the matter.”
In August, Selig’s “blue ribbon committee” meet in secret with Oakland officials about the possibility of a waterfront park, leaving the San Jose stadium in serious doubt.
Then, in November, Selig defiantly rebuffs questions about the A’s future.














49ers Hot Read
49ersnews.com
49erswebzone.com
Niner Insider
Athletics Nation
95.7 FM The Game
Bay Area Sports Talk
Popblerd
Ray Ratto – CSNBA
Ruthless Sports
Giants Extra
Giants Talk
Giants365.com
GiantsPod
Optioned to Fresno
Fangraphs
Pro Football Talk
Feltbot's Warriors Blog
Joe Lacob & Co. [libelous slander]
WarriorsCentral.com

"Over the past decade, Selig has continually clung to unwritten laws of “territorial rights,” noting that anarchy would exist without them." You do know that those "unwritten" laws are actually very written and as much a part of the MLB rules as the infield fly rule. And those rules, particularly the territorial rules, have been approved by all of the owners including the A's.
No offense but 50 miles away from SF isn't in their backyard.
When Fisher/Wolfe bought the A's, they agreed IN WRITING that the Giants own the San Jose territory. It's too easy to blame all this on Bud Selig, but the FACT is, the current A's owners are lying scumbags. They are billionaires who could build a new stadium right now and not even break a sweat. The total revenue MLB teams are raking in right now is off the charts. Selig has a lousy personality so he comes off bad to the public, but he's a SMART guy who is killing it for the owners. His inaction on this A's situation is frustrating, but Selig is at the mercy of the other owners, who are hoping the A's and Giants can cut a deal, but the Giants are too smart to let the A's in their backyard. Meanwhile the A's talk crap on Oakland, and when teams come in for a series, they lose money. Bud Selig should invoke the "best interest of baseball " clause and take the A's away from Fisher/Wolfe
Waterboard Selig,Beane and Wolff..and they admit "We lie". And that's the only way to get the truth out of those pillars of the community.
And Selig's separated at birth, bro...John Fisher.
Why don't the A's move to Sacramento or even to Las Vegas if they cannot secure territorial rights to San Jose. It still belongs to the Giants even if they have a stadium at AT&T Park in SF. I am a Giants fan so Selig being the buffoon he is, he is still bound by the territorial laws and rights. After all, without territorial laws, we might as well have the Angels, A's, Dodgers, Giants, and A's in close proximity in 500 square miles with a frenzy for the share of the Major League Baseball market.
Bud Selig is a fucking tool and is not interested in doing anything that will rock the boat. Its up to either Oakland or San Jose to make it a legal matter to get some sort of resolution. The fans deserve an answer and new stadium either way.
Sorry for the double post, but the 2nd post is my edited version
As far as what Selig said yesterday, I agree, he is a tool. He obviously desn't care about that A's. If this was any other MLB team, this probably wouldn't take as long. Even though I'm a San Francisco guy and a Giants, 49ers, and Warriors fan, I feel that the A's should stay in Oakland. Yes, it helps out the Giants but, I just hate to see fanbases get screwed. The fans in Oakland deserve the A's. As we saw in the ALDS and at the end of the season, the A's mean a lot to the people in the East Bay, and what happens if the Raiders move and the Warriors eventually move? I would hope for Oakland's sake that one of either the Raiders or the A's would stay in Oakland. Of course I don't mind the Warriors moving to San Francisco, even though I like Oracle Arena. But yeah, the A's should stay in Oakland. The San Jose thing probably won't happen. There's just too many obstacles, including the Giants having the terriorial rights, standing in the way. If the A's have a nice new stadium in either Jack London Square or downtown Oakland, I'm sure they would get decent sized crowds every home game. It might not be like the crowds the Giants get at AT&T, but I'm sure the A's would get good crowds if they had a new stadium in Oakland, like 30-35,000. I don't see why they can't build it. Obviously the people in Oakland want the A's to stay in Oakland and get a new stadium there. Also, if the A's did move to San Jose, where would they build the new stadium? I guess downtown San Jose, but where though?
They'd build here: http://www.sjredevelopment.org/ballpark.htm
Oh ok, thanks man!
*doesn't
As far as what Selig said yesterday, I agree, he is a tool. He obviously desn't care about that A's. If thiswas any other MLB team, this probably wouldn't take as long. Even though I'm a San Franciso guy and a Giants, 49ers, and Warriors fan, I feel that the A's should stay in Oakland. Yes, it helps out the Giants but, I just hate to see fanbases get screwed. The fans in Oakland deserve the A's. As we saw in the ALDS and at the end of the season, the A's mean a lot to the people in the East Bay, and what happens if the Raiders move and the Warriors eventually move? I would hope for Oakland's sake that one of either the Raiders or the A's would stay in Oakland. Of course I don't mind the Warriors moving to San Francisco, even though I like Oracle Arena. But yeah, the A's should stay in Oakland. The San Jose thing probably won't happen. There's just too many obstacles, including the Giants having the terriorial rights, standing in the way. If the A's have a nice new stadium in either Jack London Square or downtown Oakland, I'm sure they would get decent sized crowds every home game. It might not be like the crowds the Giants get at AT&T, but I'm sure the A's would get good crowds if they had a new stadium in Oakland, like 30-35,000. I don't see why they can't build it. Obviously the people in Oakland want the A's to stay in Oakland and get a new stadium there. Also, if the A's did move to San Jose, where would they build the new stadium? I guess downtown San Jose, but where though?
This needs to go on forever. What else will Tierney fake outrage over on the radio? Bob Melvin got his award so that was a short-lived "omg its disgraceful" bit for BT.
Tierney is the worst. He purposely lays on the New York accent extra thick at all times which is more than annoying. We get it. You are from the east coast. Now leave. Please. Soon. Forever.
If this tweet is credible, we won't have to listen to Tierney's empty rants much longer... http://richliebermanreport.blogspot.com/2012/11/report-tierney-to-host-new-cbs-radio.html#comment-form We can only hope that Tierney experiment is about to finally end.
haha. Yeah, I agree. It was annoying this past week when Tierney kept asking Bucher if Mark Jackson was from NY. He asked him that like 5-10 times. LOL at Bucher saying that he's from L.A. I mean yeah, Tierney does and says some things where he tries to be funny, when he just across as annoying sometimes.
Tierney really was upset. Yeah, it might seem forced, but he seemed legitimately upset. He grilled Beane for not going after Hanley, when the Marlins put him on the trading block. On the other hand, yeah, it is kind of funny how Tierney gets all worked up over the A's, when he's a Yankee fan. You do have to wonder if he seriously does care about the A's all that much. It was funny when he admitted during the playoffs that he didn't want to root against the A's, if the Yankees would've played the A's in the playoffs.
I really want a stadium built in Oakland, but this continued limbo is bad for A's fans no matter your hopes. Wolff is just as bad, press the issue or look to build outside of SJ for goodness sake!
Bud's a tool, always has been. And more prolific writers than me have put forward the theory that the "Blue Ribbon Committee" is more fiction than fact -- i.e. just another delaying tactic by the commissioner. Bud only has one speed: glacial. And the fact that his ongoing inaction & indecision keeps a west coast team in limbo is just icing on the cake for the former owner of the Brewers.
Glacial? Ah no. Selig forced the McCourts to sell the Dodgers. That was all Selig pushing for the sale. The whole process, if I recall, was complete in 3 months. So Selig can work fast.......if he choose to.
Don't give Bud too much credit -- he approved the McCourt purchase in the first place. So if he worked "fast" (8 years of McCourt ownership) it was only to cover up his own debacle in the first place.
Good point, T. Selig was also able to get the Nationals into DC, despite the proximity to Baltimore. He can make things happen if he deems it good for baseball.
Bud can "make things happen" if the most powerful owners are in favor of it. Or at least not opposed to it. Just like the commissioner of any other major professional sport. He's a lackey for the league ownership, not "the good of the game".
The deal will not get done until Bud retires or Larry Ellison decides he wants a baseball team. Then Ellison could build the dam thing himself. Bud Selig is a bafoon who hated the A's 2012 run as it brought attention to the issue he won't rule on. It's so complicated its taken all these years? Are the A's building a coliseum or a rocket ship?