It shouldn’t have been surprising, but it was. For all the talk about defense and rebounding, the Warriors went with what they know: a polished, collegiately experienced, long-range shooter with NBA genes. With Kawhi Leonard, Alec Burks, Marcus Morris and Chris Singleton on the board, the Warriors went with the player said to be Jerry West’s guy: Klay Thompson. Son of Mychal Thompson, the prize of one of West’s more celebrated trades as GM of the Lakers.
The Warriors, who need defensive rebounding, offensive rebounding, perimeter defense, interior defense and toughness (but not outside shooting, since they ranked 4th in 3-point shots made and 2nd in 3-point percentage in 2010-11), took a what amounts to a taller Stephen Curry. Why? Because as Larry Riley said after the selection was made, they want “a player with an NBA skill.” That’s why Leonard “was never an option on my list,” Riley said.
Minutes after Riley did his best to destroy the very idea that Leonard could ever help any NBA team, let alone the Warriors, the Spurs traded for him. Oh well, what do those nerds know.
Even though the Warriors needed above all else to take a step toward a lineup full of guys who wouldn’t be pushed around on a regular basis, they took Thompson, a guy whose game screams finesse (but politely, of course). But he’s with the team to stay, at least for the next year, so what does this draft choice mean for the Warriors? What’s their plan? Do they have one?
1. Good-bye Reggie Williams
The Warriors signed Williams to a qualifying offer this week, but he’s as good as gone. Williams is as good a shooter as Thompson — who as Ethan Sherwood Strauss pointed out, wasn’t especially efficient shooting the ball in college — but played tentatively far too often last season. After the Warriors got used to paying Williams fresh-from-the-D-League money, they aren’t too keen on paying him an NBA veteran’s salary — kind of like C.J. Watson and Anthony Morrow before him.
2. The Warriors are still shopping Monta Ellis
Regardless of what the Warriors say about depth (and that’s kind of a joke, since every team is looking for depth in the draft — the Warriors are looking for talent), you don’t choose a guy No. 11 without at least hoping he’ll start for you someday. When the Warriors say “depth,” what they actually mean is “guard depth,” because if they trade Ellis for someone taller than 6-7 after drafting a forward in the first round instead of Thompson, their guard rotation would have been Curry/Lin/Charles Jenkins, meaning they’d have to seriously consider bringing back Williams and/or Acie “you can’t stop me from shooting threes” Law (shudder).
3. Defense (still) isn’t a priority
The biggest laugh came on draft night, when Riley said in the minutes following the Warriors’ first round selection, “We’re going to have to work with Klay, teach him the defensive schemes.” I didn’t know reaching in, lazy footwork and soft fouls during layups and dunks (and-one!) were defensive schemes. From the scouting reports on Thompson, who spent most of his time at Washington State focusing on scoring, he should fit right in.
4. Jerry West is the GM
Thompson was rumored to be West’s guy for days leading up to the draft. As the draft grew closer, Thompson was listed at No. 11 on more and more mocks. Riley, Bob Myers, Kirk Lacob and (most importantly) Joe Lacob may have all agreed with West on this pick, but perception’s reality here. Everyone now thinks West runs things, so he does.
5. The Warriors went safe so they could gamble later
The Warriors considered Leonard too much of a risk for a couple reasons, it seemed. First, his offense doesn’t project to excite the fans early on. Second, he didn’t want to work out for the Warriors. Since it appears one of the Warriors’ main goals this draft was to acquire Jeremy Tyler — as Tom Ziller said, “A $2-million flyer on Tyler is like a $2 million craps role. Good luck.” — the Warriors wanted to make sure they got at least one rotation player while swinging for the fences in the early second round.
For a team that has had to dip into the NBDL far too often over the years (with more success than anyone would have expected, to be fair), it makes sense that the Warriors wanted to make sure their first round pick wasn’t a complete flop. Except the Warriors’ idea of a flop is exactly why they’ve been in the same position for years. Offense without defense is fine, while defense without offense isn’t part of the “fan experience” they’re looking for. That’s not saying the Warriors should trade for Hasheem Thabeet (in fact, if those rumors that the Rockets offered Thabeet and Jordan Hill for Biedrins are true, I don’t blame the Warriors for saying no — both Thabeet and Hill are useless, while Biedrins has at least been an above-average starting center within the past five years).
But the Warriors’ habit of counting on “team defense” while adding players who care little about defense of any kind (Al Thornton, anyone?) isn’t new, and it’s incredibly faulty. Especially for a team without a discernible team leader, and whose candidates for that role (Curry, Ellis and David Lee) are all offensively-focused. For that reason, drafting a guy like Singleton or Leonard would actually be less of a gamble, since they can at least defend wing players. But the Warriors’ desire to remain an “up-tempo” team trumps all, so they added yet another fundamentally sound shooter in Thompson to keep Curry (who in the video below seems like he’d rather be anywhere but Golden State) company. Should be fun watching their latest first round pick struggle to get shots up over Leonard and Singleton in the coming years.














49ers Hot Read
49ersnews.com
49erswebzone.com
Niner Insider
Athletics Nation
95.7 FM The Game
Bay Area Sports Talk
Popblerd
Ray Ratto – CSNBA
Ruthless Sports
Giants Extra
Giants Talk
Giants365.com
GiantsPod
Optioned to Fresno
Fangraphs
Pro Football Talk
Feltbot's Warriors Blog
Joe Lacob & Co. [libelous slander]
WarriorsCentral.com

Pretty good analysis overall. I have a couple of issues: 1) This isn't a disagreement, as you could well be right, but I'm not as convinced as everyone else that the choice of Thompson is evidence for Monta being shopped. I suspect the FO is looking at everything and not against trading either Monta or Curry, but that they are not actively shopping him. The Thompson pick makes sense (aside from the main point that he was the best pick in the draft at that slot) because he can come off the bench next season and give both Monta and Curry a rest. If he shows himself to be decent, we can then look at mixing things up, possibly pushing for a trade. But I think they are going to integrate Thompson in the back court rather than use him as a replacement, at least this coming season. 2) I don't know where you are getting the idea that the W's are going to remain a run and gun team ("The Warriors’ desire to remain an “up-tempo” team trumps all")? I have yet to hear any language on this coming from the front office. Is this your own thesis or do you have some quotes?
Not exactly the front office, but here's what Mark Jackson said after he got hired: Will you stop the Warriors' uptempo style? "Absolutely not. We will push the basketball. We will look to make plays in transition. We will not just push it just to be pushing it. We'll have a mindset to take care of the basketball, to get quality looks. But those looks are going to be earned on the defensive end." http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/warriors/detail?entry_id=90549#ixzz1QVgneA4H A guy with nearly unlimited range as a shooter who can pass (like Thompson) spreads out the defense and becomes pretty valuable in transition. But if the Warriors were serious about becoming a better defensive team, Thompson was a strange choice.
To even quote what Tom Ziller thinks of the Warriors draft is completely laughable, Tom Ziller is nothing more than a Sacto Kings fan boy who hates everything Warriors. If you desire to be credible you may want to avoid quoting Ziller in the future.
Pretty testy criticism but no clear idea about the Thompson pick, huh? Familiar "credibility smear" stuff there. Ray Ridder would be proud.
I know Ziller's a Sac Kings blogger and not exactly the voice of God, but how can you disagree with his point on Tyler? Even his biggest supporters say stuff like: "He's good and big," Myers responded. "But you've got to keep him on a leash a little bit." There's something to work with here, but it's clearly the big gamble the Warriors wanted to take in this draft. Now if I said I thought the Warriors had a bad draft because Ziller gave them a D+, I can see your point. But you can reference another writer without agreeing with every one of his/her viewpoints.
In my opinion, the front court issues could not be (immediately*) addressed in this draft. Klay will complement the back court and it's not hard to imagine Klay and Steph creating a real synergy. Let's look to FA and trades for defense and rebounding as planned by the Warriors braintrust. *Jeremy Tyler is the future.
But how many of the same type of shooting guard are they going to cycle through? Like Marco Belinelli and Anthony Morrow before him, watch for Klay Thompson to score 40 pts in a Summer League game, excite the fans, play inconsistently over a few years and then leave for another team. The rest of the NBA is stocking up on small forwards who can defend. Why can't the Warriors do the same? If the plan is to trade Monta, putting Dorell at the 2 next to a guy like Leonard or Singleton suddenly makes the Warriors a lot more imposing on the perimeter.
He's nothing like Morrow. Won't rebound, will not be reliable from NBA range 3. Far less athletic. Talks prettier though. He's a lot like Curry in all the worst ways.
He's a better passer than Morrow, probably about as good a ballhandler (not that great), and Morrow's probably a better rebounder. I don't think Thompson's a bad player, and like many good outside shooters, he'll probably have a long career. I just think he was the safest player available, not the best. But I also spent almost two years singing the praises of Anthony Randolph, so there you go.
I'm give Klay the befefit of the doubt that he's a better player than Belineli, Morrow or Williams. I think Dorell can take some time at the 2 but he's too strong at the 3 spot. Realistically, a signings like Battier and Dalembert while keeping all remainder of the roster could do the trick for a playoff run.
Solid, though West is not in on decisions. listen to his KNBR interview. He wasn't hyped on Thompson at all. Telling the PR crew (Flunkster Dude/Ray Ridder hasn't gone anywhere) has been pushing "West's Pick" as heavily as they have. They know their cred is nil, trying to buy some wherever they can. When do Warriors fans get a full glass?
Do you really think West would allow this perception to exist if it weren't at least close to reality? He doesn't need the money, and I'm sure if he told the Warriors to stop leaking stuff on his behalf, they'd have to listen. He could be a consultant on at least half the teams in the league and make similar money while living in L.A. Why would he let the Warriors use him as a pawn in the media?
West has no authority. He isn't being paid, he got a free ownership percentage he can cash in any time he wants. It's pure PR. He did some press events early and he answers the phone. His first independent statement (Ellis/Curry) has already been vehemently and reactively contradicted by the Oakland contingency. Instead of making a relevant roster change or big time coaching hire, they went with a Rowell cannings, a loud visible Jackson hiring, and more "wait and see" BS in the draft.
However, the Thompson pick is NOT wait and see- that's a "he's old and already does something" cheapskate ownership move. The weird counterintuitive overspend on Tyler (by his former agent of course) doesn't diminish the obvious interests in the Thompson decision. He's a Curry clone. This is not a good team being built here.
Your cynicism, while understandable, is completely misguided. It's equivalent to being pissed at your current girlfriend because of what your previous girlfriend did. We had the 11th pick in a weak draft and we're a lottery team. You take best player available. Period. Some believe Leonard or Singleton was best player available but that is subjective. It only takes 30 seconds of reviewing past drafts to see that lottery is an apt term. You can't know how players will develop no matter how much scouting you do. We have to wait and see what other moves can be made in the off-season before we can even judge the draft. It takes more time to turn a franchise around.
But that devil woman ripped my heart out, and then she stomped on it! You're right, it's subjective. I don't believe Thompson was the best player available, and I don't think it's because he's a bad player, but because my idea of the kinds of players who are the best differ from the Warriors'. This team's only real strengths last year were scoring from the guards (I count Dorell Wright as a 2/3) and outside shooting. Thompson just brings more of the same.
I don't disagree that Thompson doesn't really fill a need, but it seems like Leonard's offense is so limited that Kyle ends up being the better all around player. I tend to think defense is more a state of mind and easier to improve than pure offensive skills. Yes, there are defensive freaks like Howard, but then you have elite defenders like Kidd, who isn't the strongest, tallest, or fastest guy at his position, but can guard 1's and 2's because of his BBall IQ. I think even with our current roster we can be an average defensive team with the right system and accountability. Maybe it won't work out, but we have to at least acknowledge that nobody on this team has been asked to play defense, so we don't really know what they are capable of.
Thompson's more polished, sure, but Leonard's a much more athletic player and a 10 rpg guy. When I saw the guy play I thought to myself "NBA small forward." When I saw Thompson, I thought, "now there's a guy who can win some H-O-R-S-E games in practice." Team defense is great and all, but it takes some players who are willing to bust ass on that end. You need a guy or two who can take the pressure off the players who are limited defensively due to offensive responsibility or physical limitations. Otherwise you have leave the entirety of your defense to how well your coach(es) can motivate them to focus on team defense, which is pretty tough without individual players on the team buying in. If you have a bunch of guys who'd rather focus on offense than defense, that job becomes nearly impossible, I don't care if you're talking about Mark Jackson, Keith Smart, Phil Jackson or Gregg Popovich.
*klay