There is something wrong with David Akers, an All-Pro kicker last year who has struggled since tying the all-time record with a 63-yard field goal at Lambeau. The question is whether Akers’ main problem is physical or mental, and in this case we’re left to guess. After missing a potential game-winning 41-yarder yesterday in overtime, Akers left the locker room without speaking to the media.
Akers can’t similarly avoid his coaches, because it’s getting close to decision time. If Akers can’t deliver when the 49ers need him the most, what’s the point of keeping him around? Look at his FG stats from Week 3 on (but only if you have a strong stomach):
20-29: 3-for-3
30-39: 3-for-3
40-49: 3-for-7
50-59: 0-for-2
Total: 15-for-21 (71.4% — 30th in the NFL)
When it comes to kickoffs, Akers has been … okay. The Niners are 9th in the NFL in touchbacks, but opponents’ starting field position (28.8 yard line) on kickoffs opponents are averaging 28.8 yards per kickoff return, which is second worst in league.
The problem is Akers picked a bad time to lose his ability to kick field goals accurately — for the 49ers, anyway. Who’s available? They could go with Ryan Longwell, a Cal grad who’s about the same age as Akers, but how much of an upgrade would he be? Guys like Graham Gano and Olindo Mare are available … blech. Giorgio Tavecchio is a left-footer like Akers, but he wasn’t even all that great at Cal before the 49ers brought him in for a tryout. The Niners would be better off keeping Akers than throwing an inexperienced rookie while the 49ers look to improve their playoff seed.
If the 49ers decide to make a change, the best option is probably Nate Kaeding, who the San Diego Chargers recently released. Kaeding had a groin injury that led San Diego to put him on IR, but he passed a physical at the end of October before the Chargers let him go. Kaeding only played in one game in 2011 due to a torn left ACL, but he is the most accurate field goal kicker in NFL history (87%) among those who have played longer than two seasons.
Would releasing a kicker who was named first-team All-Pro last year be harsh? Yes, but that’s the nature of the NFL. Akers was released by the Philadelphia Eagles to open up cap space after they drafted Alex Henery in the fourth round of the 2011 NFL Draft. Missing field goals from 34 and 41 yards in a 21-16 Wild Card Round loss to the Packers didn’t help, either. A missed 41-yard field goal, huh? Sounds familiar.















49ers Hot Read
49ersnews.com
49erswebzone.com
Niner Insider
Athletics Nation
95.7 FM The Game
Bay Area Sports Talk
Popblerd
Ray Ratto – CSNBA
Ruthless Sports
Giants Extra
Giants Talk
Giants365.com
GiantsPod
Optioned to Fresno
Fangraphs
Pro Football Talk
Feltbot's Warriors Blog
Joe Lacob & Co. [libelous slander]
WarriorsCentral.com

Hat tip to Bay Area Sports Guy for being on top of the Akers issue. As I've noted elsewhere, this is his worst season since 2005, when he injured his groin.
Mike Sando, the NFC West blogger at ESPN has an interesting take. Here's a sample: "Akers' overall field goal percentage has fallen from 84.6 last season to 71.4 through nine games this season. The decline stems almost entirely from a reduction in chances from short range. Akers averaged 2.1 attempts per game from inside 40 yards last season. If that rate had held firm in 2012 and Akers continued to make nearly all of them, as he has done with the 49ers, his overall percentage for 2012 would be in the low 80s." And: "Akers has made 6 of 10 attempts from 40-49 yards this season. He was 6-of-11 last season." Check it out: http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/81370/around-the-nfc-west-akers-not-slumping
I don't think I was clear enough in the post. My point wasn't that I'd advise the 49ers to drop David Akers in favor of Nate Kaeding (like they'd even listen). My point was that there are few alternatives. Out of the kickers who are available, Kaeding is probably the best option. Unless Akers is injured or continues to struggle, the 49ers will keep him. And based on his track record I think there's a decent chance he turns things around. But missing a potential game-winner in overtime on a day without rain or strong winds was surely something that bothered the coaching staff quite a bit.
Not buying the love for Kaeding. Mike Vanderjagt previously had the NFL record for Successful percentage and look how that turned out when he went to Dallas. Kaeding looked exactly the same in his last playoff game. The more worrying thing for me now will be if we are in 4th and 1 situations within FG range, or in that now "Dangerous 40-50 yard area" and we bring out the vanilla offence to try to just get enough or the scary sweep play again! Yikes!
This crap is giving me Owen Pochman flashbacks
Akers is also great in the warmups before the game. He always hits it before the game so I don't know what's happening but hopefully he turns things around and fast!
Yeah, I think Akers will be ok. He did kick a 63 yd. FG in the season opener against the Packers! Akers is probably just going through a cold spell right now. I agree that he will hit a big FG when it's all on the line. Yeah, his FG issues are a concern, but I think Akers will be ok.
trade for Janikowski...
Keep akers... He will hit the big one when its all on the line I have faith
Joe Nedney...
Kaeding is 8-for-15 in the playoffs, including an 0-for-3 stinker in his last playoff game against the Jets almost three years ago
You have to hope he will shake it off. if not, Giorgio Tavecchio anyone?
As frustrated as I am with Akers right now (especially after yesterday), I can't quite get behind Nate Kaeding given his track record in the playoffs. We're probably stuck with Akers for the time being, and hopefully he regains his 2011 form.
I'd be down with Nate Kaeding, especially with that accuracy statistic
Nate the Great! Dump Akers now.
Yes. Unless he turns it around fast, he'll be on the street.